Saturday, July 04, 2015

Data Interpretation Quiz 2015 - Set 51


Hello and welcome to ExamPundit. Here is a set of Data Interpretation Quiz for SBI PO Mains 2015.


Performance of candidates in an University Exam during academic years of 1995 to 2000 in different disciplines.



1. The number of Candidates Appeared under Agriculture in 1998 was approximately what percent of number of candidates qualified under Arts in 1997?
(a) 20
(b) 100
(c) 400
(d) 40
(e) 200




2. What was the percentage drop in number of candidates qualified in Science from 1997 to 1998?
(a) 10
(b) 20
(c) 50
(d) 25
(e) None of these




3. In which of the following disciplines was there a continous increase in number of candidates appearing of the given years?
(a) Arts
(b) Commerce
(c) Agriculture
(d) Science
(e) None




4. In which of the following years was the percentage qualified to appeared one in Engineering discipline the maximum?
(a) 1995
(b) 1996
(c) 1998
(d) 1999
(e) 2000





5. In which of the following years was percentage of total number of candidates of all the disciplines together qualified to the appeared ones, the maximum?
(a) 1996
(b) 1997
(c) 1998
(d) 1999
(e) 2000




For Solutions, Please check the featured comment below.


Regards



Team ExamPundit


Sponsored

Books For 2015 Banking/Insurance Exams

Share this

Get free quizzes and news related to SBI PO, IBPS PO and all other exams.

48 Responses to "Data Interpretation Quiz 2015 - Set 51"

  1. 1st one i m getting 196

    ReplyDelete
  2. how 3d , there is adrop in 1998

    ReplyDelete
  3. Aap apna kro..mera kyu dekh rhe ho..I will chk again .. :P

    ReplyDelete
  4. 1-e 2-a 3-e 4-b 5-c

    ReplyDelete
  5. any short trick for 5th one??

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes! But will be said after the quiz!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Abhishek Verma(sbi po.aasan h)July 4, 2015 at 1:47 PM

    e a e d

    ReplyDelete
  8. .......cwe v(i can do it)July 4, 2015 at 1:48 PM

    1)196 c
    2)a
    3)e

    ReplyDelete
  9. 1. e 2. a 3. e 4. d 5. c

    ReplyDelete
  10. Abhishek Verma(sbi po.aasan h)July 4, 2015 at 1:49 PM

    5-c

    ReplyDelete
  11. Don't calculate like qly/app * 100. It takes time, try with app:qly ratio! Least/Maximum one can be decided very easily.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Rudra(1+1=2,2-1-1=0)July 4, 2015 at 1:52 PM

    1-E,2-A,3-E,4-D,5-

    ReplyDelete
  13. For eg. for Q5.
    1995:

    4629/1254

    » 46/12

    » 4



    1996:

    5354/1455

    » 53/14

    » 4



    1997:

    5171/1470

    » 51/14

    » 3
    9/14



    1998:



    4562/1418

    » 45/14

    » 3 3/14 = least





    1999:



    6039/1824

    » 60/18

    » 3 1/3



    2000:



    7086/2157

    » 70/21

    » 1 1/3





    Easy and Effective

    ReplyDelete
  14. Rudra(1+1=2,2-1-1=0)July 4, 2015 at 1:57 PM

    dada Please explain it with an example..

    ReplyDelete
  15. 1995 to option me hi nhi hai so why we calculate :)

    ReplyDelete
  16. Upar dekho! Q5 ka, Ratio banao, approximately usko chhota karo! then convert

    ReplyDelete
  17. I elaborated with full! Just to show that how it is done!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Abhishek Verma(sbi po.aasan h)July 4, 2015 at 2:00 PM

    for 2000
    it is 3 3/7

    ReplyDelete
  19. Just teasing. I understand

    ReplyDelete
  20. Abhishek Verma(sbi po.aasan h)July 4, 2015 at 2:00 PM

    sry
    3 1/3

    ReplyDelete
  21. Rudra(1+1=2,2-1-1=0)July 4, 2015 at 2:00 PM

    thanks dada:)

    ReplyDelete
  22. Abhishek Verma(sbi po.aasan h)July 4, 2015 at 2:03 PM

    k dada.:)
    waise maine same method se kia but sirf 1998 n 2000 k lie

    ReplyDelete
  23. i know its irrelevant but anyone has idea what will be the difficulty level of lic ado exam? similar to ao or assistant?

    ReplyDelete
  24. It will depend on person to person ;) And also Confidence level in this subject

    ReplyDelete
  25. Abhishek Verma(sbi po.aasan h)July 4, 2015 at 2:05 PM

    yes u r ryt.:)))

    ReplyDelete
  26. There will be Expected Questions Today! So stay tuned!

    ReplyDelete
  27. 4d 5c
    I misinterpreted the questions

    ReplyDelete